The article published the Banking Administration to answer report National Audit Office on how the sale of the government’s 22.5 percent stake in Íslandsbanki would have been successful in March. The National Audit Office found that there were several things, such as the alleged lack of experience and knowledge of the Banking Authority when it came to the route taken during the auction, that the prices could have been sold at a higher price and that information had been insufficient.
The Norwegian Banking Administration criticizes the National Audit Office for relying on limited data and says that if its answers had been taken into account, it would have changed more in the review process than it actually did. However, there are still „reflections and various ill-founded conclusions that cannot be seen to have a basis in the legal environment under which the Norwegian Banking Authority operates“.
Unprofessional words of the state auditor
Among the things that the Banking Administration criticizes are words made by Guðmundi Björgvin Helgason, the Auditor General Indicator. He is quoted as saying that the report would attract attention and publicity. These comments, the Bank Systil says, are „not only unprofessional and apt to undermine trust in him and the work that is currently at hand, but they also raise questions about whether there are such circumstances that his impartiality can rightly be called into question. .“ Banking Commissioners say that the report would have attracted little or no attention if the National Audit Office had taken the Banking Commissioner’s comments into account. It must be evaluated in light of Guðmundar’s words before the publication of the report.